Showing posts with label deregulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deregulation. Show all posts

Sunday, November 2, 2008

How De-Regulating Insurance Across State Lines Would Invite Our Next National Disaster

Free-Market Policies Have Their Place. We are a nation built on the principles of unfettered capitalism that have enabled generations of Americans to reach the shared American dream.

The Ideal of Free Markets—the Rights of All People to Compete Fairly in the Market Place—is a cornerstone of the land of opportunity.

But Free-Market Policies Also Have Their Limits. If we have learned nothing else from the post-Glass Steagall experiment and the resulting mortgage and banking and investment debacle, let us take this lesson with us.

Quality and Price Are the Two Competing Factors of Competition that free-market ambitions often overlook. In relation to products that affect broad national interests—such as mortgage products—such as investment opportunities—such as insurance policies—competitive freedom often works out badly. This situation occurs when the opportunity to buy and sell on price overwhelms the need to protect a product’s underlying quality.

Quality of Healthcare Paid for Under Private Health Insurance Policies exemplifies this situation. It is an example of a situation in which free-market ideals, if followed too-closely, would cause overwhelming damage to our national economic health.


So Why Would De-Regulating Insurance Be Such an Unmitigated Disaster?

A: First, Because of the Abundance of “Small Print” that insurance policies must contain, hundreds of details exist that can be hard to understand, easy to overlook, and almost-impossible to compare. It is in situations where comparisons are ineffective that free-market benefits disappear.

B: When Comparisons Can’t Be Made, cost—price—becomes the predominant measure. When cost is the predominant measure, quality becomes temporarily irrelevant. Quality becomes a cost deferred.

C: When the Lowest-Cost Insurance Is Bought by All, competition can hardly survive. Competitors must lower the quality of their own policies in order to compete with lower rates. Meanwhile, those persons under-insured because of the nature of the deficient policies must continue to rely on public medical services—e.g., unnecessary emergency room visits—or suffer financial ruin despite their efforts to keep themselves adequately insured.

D: Results:
1: A nation in which many people previously lacked insurance now becomes a nation in which all people have inadequate insurance.
2: As in the current economic crisis, the deferred costs of health care inadequately covered by the deficient policies become a tax on the entire nation.

What America Needs Now is improvement in our health care and health insurance. Deregulating the products so that less-reputable insurance companies could offer competing products based solely on price would force countless Americans to spend their limited insurance dollars on dangerously limited insurance products.

Our Great Nation Is Currently Climbing out of a Hole that mortgage and banking deregulation dug for us, with its shovel of free-market theory.


America’s Love Affair with Free-Market Ideals Must Never Waver


But the Essential Countervailing Ideals of Pragmatism also must never be ignored. Nor may free-market idealism be allowed to bring us to the brink of financial ruin ever again.


Sunday, October 26, 2008

Does John McCain Still Want to Be President?

In John McCain’s History, we see a war hero who has devoted his career to serving the American people in the United States Congress. His efforts at following conscience over the dictates of political convenience have been respected in both political parties.

The Three Cornerstones of Senator McCain's Politics have been reform and deregulation and war.

As Regards Reform, he sponsored 2002’s McCain-Feingold Campaign Reform Act. He speaks firmly now in favor of regulating the greed that has taken the American economy to the brink of disaster. Senator McCain’s commitment to reform in Congress is clear.

But Has It Made Any Difference?

As Regards War, Senator McCain believes strongly in the conduct of the War in Iraq. He has supported the current president unwaveringly, saying that he would rather lose the presidency in order to win a war, than win the presidency and lose the war. Some people believe that the senator's commitment to the War in Iraq reflects a desire to re-fight the Vietnam War—and win this time. No more "domino effect," leading the Communist Chinese and Vietnamese hordes to make beach-landing attacks on our Pacific shores.

Not Like Last Time...

But on the Deregulation Front, it is the Republican Party’s relentless pursuit of deregulations that has led us to the current financial crisis.

The Result of Deregulation Is the Current Economic Fiasco. 1999’s Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act, which removed the Depression-era safeguards of 1933’s Glass-Steagall Act, was the precipitate cause of what we face today. (This act was sponsored by the same Phil Gramm who until recently was the senior economic advisor of the McCain campaign.)

More-Recently, the Demise of the Entire Republican Economic Premise was acknowledged by former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. "Shocked disbelief" is how Mr. Greenspan put it, admitting that the underlying basis of Republican economic theory is as bankrupt as the nation on which the theory has been tested.

If John McCain’s Primary Focus as a Senator has been to move toward deregulation—as he has reiterated countless times during the lengthy presidential campaign—and it is the abject failure of such deregulations that has caused the current financial meltdown, what is left for John McCain to do?

Net Result: No Effective Reform, No Win in Iraq, an Economy in Crisis.

So What Would John McCain Do if he were elected as President? What more would he deregulate? What new wars would he choose to fight?

Does John McCain Really Still Want to Be President?

If So, Why?






Monday, October 6, 2008

Guilt by Association and the Terrorism of Deregulation (Part II)

The Terrorism of Deregulation:

The Economy of the United States of America has struggled under years and years of the "terrorism" of deregulation. Can our economy continue to support a “deregulation Maverick” like Senator John McCain?

As Election Time Draws Near and the Economy Sinks, Senator McCain and his “Maverick” running mate will be talking more and more about anything they can get away with, doing their best to distract Americans from the real challenges that face America today.

Is This Any Way to Run an Election? John McCain said that he’d rather lose an election and save the economy, than lose the economy just to win an election.

Guilt by Association Is not New. And it’s no surprise. In fact, a McCain-Palin campaign worker today said,

“If We Keep Talking about the Economy, We’re Going to Lose.”

Small Wonder That the Maverick Deregulator who encouraged decades of "deregulation terrorism"—from the Savings & Loans, all the way to Wall Street—would want to talk about just about anything else.

Terrorism? Deregulation? Savings & Loan Scandal? Which of these things really matter when it comes to feeding your family, filling up your gas tank, paying for college, and saving for retirement?

Barack Obama Needs Your Vote on November 4, 2008. It's time to change America. Senator McCain wants to talk about Barack Obama and Distinguished Educator William Ayers. Why would the McCain-Palin ticket rather talk about that?


Thank You for Your Support.

Guilt by Association and the Terrorism of Deregulation (Part I)

Guilt by Association:

While Senator John McCain
Actively Participated as a member in the scandal of Charles Keating and the Keating Five, Barack Obama had absolutely nothing to do with America’s war in Vietnam.

When the Vietnam War was Lost, Barack Obama was 13 years old.

Barack Obama Had Nothing to Do with anti-war activities back in the 1960s. When William Ayers committed his anti-Vietnam War activities—for which Distinguished Educator Ayers has since turned himself in and apologized—Barack Obama was 9 years old!

Barack Obama Met Mr. Ayers as a Respected Educator in the 1990s, helping to reform a crumbling Chicago education system. Not as a terrorist, but more than 20 years later, as an educator.

Does the McCain-Palin Campaign Honestly Believe Barack Obama should put politics ahead of Chicago school kids? Should Barack Obama, like John McCain, put politics ahead of the American people?

To Fix the Current Economic Crisis, the Obama team of leaders includes: Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett; former Reagan Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker; and former Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin. Are these the kind of people John McCain would accuse of supporting a former terrorist?

President & Senator Clinton: Is Sarah Palin implying that Senator Clinton would support a terrorist? Does John McCain mean that President Clinton would support a terrorist?

Coming in Part II: "The Terrorism of Deregulation"


Thank You for Your Support.

What Difference Does John McCain Make?

What Difference Does John McCain’s Involvement in the Losing Savings & Loan Meltdown back in 1987, and the Keating Five scandal, make in today’s economy?

What Difference Does John McCain’s Involvement in the Losing Vietnam and Iraq Wars make in today’s foreign relations?

What Difference Does John McCain’s Role as a Deregulating Maverick in Today's Losing Economy have to do with the need to bail out Wall Street with 700,000,000,000 of American taxpayer dollars?

What Do 26 Years of Loss and Failure Have to Do with America’s Next President?

On November 4, 2008, We Can Elect Barack Obama President of the United States, and Joe Biden Vice-President to serve at his side. Unless we want more years of deregulation, loss and failure.

It’s Time to Put Someone Who Knows How to Win for the American people in the White House. Not just to fight, but to win....

Can American Survive Four More Years of More of the Same Loss and Failure? Of Course.

But Thrive? No.


It's Time for Real Change with President Barack Obama.



Thank You for Your Support.

Friday, October 3, 2008

Sarah Palin Disputes John McCain

In Last-Night’s Vice-Presidential Debate, Governor Sarah Palin promised to join John McCain and clean up Washington.

Disputing Senator McCain’s Oft-Repeated Deregulator Claim, Governor Palin said, “Now, as for John McCain's adherence to rules and regulations and pushing for even harder and tougher regulations, that is another thing that he is known for though.”

Senator McCain Disagrees With His Running Mate. Senator McCain maintains that he has always been known as “a deregulator.” (At least until a few weeks ago.)

I Am a Deregulator. I Believe in Deregulation,” said Senator McCain, speaking on CNN five years ago, on 07/13/2003. And here is Senator McCain, less than two weeks ago, in an interview on 60 Minutes (air date: 09/21/2008):


CBS (Scott Pelley):
“In 1999 you were one of the senators who helped pass deregulation of Wall Street. Do you regret that now?”


McCain:
“No, I think the deregulation was probably helpful to the growth of our economy.”



Vice-Presidential Candidate Joe Biden Disagrees: “So what you had is you had overwhelming ‘deregulation.’ You had actually the belief that Wall Street could self-regulate itself.”

Here Is Senator McCain, Again From 60 Minutes:


CBS:
“McCain has been an advocate of deregulation most of his career, but Thursday he endorsed the biggest bailout in history—a plan for the government to take on the bad debts of financial institutions.”


McCain:
“We’re going to take over these bad loans. We’re going to take over these bad, these bonds and we’re going to keep you alive. And we’re going to have the taxpayer help you out. But when the time comes and the economy recovers, then anything that’s gained back is going to go to the taxpayers first.”



The “We” That Senator McCain Is Talking About is the United States Government, that Senator McCain has served for the past 26 years—"deregulating" and “cleaning up” Washington.

Listening to Senator McCain, it’s clear why his cleanup efforts have been unsuccessful.

In His Earnest Effort to Get Elected, Senator McCain can’t decide whether government regulation is the problem—or the solution.

And So He Promises Both.

Can You “Clean Up Washington” and “Deregulate” at the Same Time? Governor Palin and Senator McCain both say "Yes!" But John McCain's 26 years as a "Maverick" in the United States Congress says no.


Thank You for Your Support